KOTCT Members Forum
May 09, 2024, 05:54:55 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Rules Search Calendar Members Login Register KITCO US MINT KOTCT Hist. Perth Mint 2centworld  
Welcome to a stroll down memory lane... Looks a lot different, HUH?
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
Author Topic: 2000 MILLENNIUM YEAR 50 cents question  (Read 1233 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
djluster
Guest
Trade Count: (0)


Email
« on: November 07, 2007, 06:13:36 AM »

I know there are two different 2000 millennium 50 cents. I wanted to know the difference. if any one post a picture that would really help or explain it very well that would help to but I think a picture would help me more. I am woking on a Australian type set and wanted to include both of them.
Logged
buda
Trade Count: (2)
Knight Argent
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 253



View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2007, 07:15:28 AM »


if you look at the cross in the flag u will see it incused.
Logged

Wife thinks i love coins more than her
I think it&
buda
Trade Count: (2)
Knight Argent
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 253



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2007, 07:22:02 AM »

this one is not a incused cross +
Logged

Wife thinks i love coins more than her
I think it&
Topher
Guest
Trade Count: (0)


Email
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2007, 08:06:25 AM »

Ahh!!! The CROSS is incused.  I was wondering what was different.  I didn't know which part was incused.  Thanks for the pics.  That clears it up quite well.  I still have a lot to learn about Aussie coin varieties. 
Logged
Twoshadows
"Master Collector"
Trade Count: (10)
Knight Argent
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2229


Buffalo Pilot


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2007, 09:17:42 AM »

So where these two varieties planned or how did this happen
Logged

Terry
Knight #1

"Life's a Lemon, I want my money back!" (Meatloaf)
triggersmob
Trade Count: (30)
Knight Argent
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1960


Western Australian State Flag


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2007, 04:38:31 PM »

You can also tell the difference by looking at the big star. If I remember correectly, the incuse version has a smooth bottom inside the star, wereas the non incuse has a rough bottom. Maybe someone can confirm that I have this the right way round. I don't have an incuse to check. 
Logged

Steve
Nevol
Global Moderator
Trade Count: (19)
Knight Argent
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1243


Queensland State Flag


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2007, 07:22:18 PM »

It's as you said, triggersmob. The largest star on the Incuse variety also seems to be slightly larger than on the regular coin. All the stars on the incuse have smooth inners as do the 4 inner 'arms' of the diagonal cross in the flag. 
Logged

KOTCT #46
Nancy

Life is a mystery to be lived, not a problem to be solved.
Twoshadows
"Master Collector"
Trade Count: (10)
Knight Argent
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2229


Buffalo Pilot


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2007, 09:04:58 PM »

So I still have the same question! Were these coins meant to be or was one or the other for a proof or mint set only? Or was this just a major mint boo-boo?
Logged

Terry
Knight #1

"Life's a Lemon, I want my money back!" (Meatloaf)
Nevol
Global Moderator
Trade Count: (19)
Knight Argent
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1243


Queensland State Flag


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2007, 03:59:23 AM »

Twoshadows, It's believed by some that the Incuse might have originally been intended for either mint/proof sets, but the dies somehow got mixed up & some 'escaped'.  Actual numbers of escapees is unknown. They're hunted down & captured wherever & whenever possible. Quite ofted held to ransom on Ebay!

The Proof coin theory sort of makes sense to me, as the 50¢ proofs had a coloured flag, so it's possible that was why the cross was incused. However, the  proof coins actually have a slightly smaller flag , so if the incused was meant to be used for proofs, it didn't actually happen. I doubt that anyone knows the REAL story behind them, but I could be wrong. 

Logged

KOTCT #46
Nancy

Life is a mystery to be lived, not a problem to be solved.
Twoshadows
"Master Collector"
Trade Count: (10)
Knight Argent
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2229


Buffalo Pilot


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2007, 04:02:14 AM »

So am I to assume the "incused" design is bringing a Kings Ransom? Very interesting variety and mystery to go along with it! Couldn't have one without the other so it would be a desirable set!
Logged

Terry
Knight #1

"Life's a Lemon, I want my money back!" (Meatloaf)
CoinCrusader42
Knight Excalibur
Trade Count: (13)
Knight Argent
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1866



View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2007, 09:52:56 AM »

Anybody know what the rare version is currently selling for?

 Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley
Logged

KOTCT No. 2
ANA:  42203
Collector since 1956
Rusty
Trade Count: (0)
Knight
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2007, 11:31:52 AM »

Hi CC,
The incused Millenium coins are selling on Aussie Ebay for $20 to $100 depending on condition.
A couple of links for you to check.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/50-cent-2000-INCUSED-millennium-coin-VERY-SCARCE_W0QQitemZ200170493861QQihZ010QQcategoryZ41108QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Aus-2000-Incused-millenium-50c-coin-Scarce-rare-A637_W0QQitemZ170164769338QQihZ007QQcategoryZ3372QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Australia-RARE-2000-INCUSED-Variety-50-Cent-Coin_W0QQitemZ110190958934QQihZ001QQcategoryZ3372QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

The third one has an excellent close up of the flag. Best of luck and cheers.

Edit to fix fat fingers type spelling error. LOL.
Logged
CoinCrusader42
Knight Excalibur
Trade Count: (13)
Knight Argent
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1866



View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2007, 05:53:08 AM »

Looks affordable.

Thanks for the links.

 Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley
Logged

KOTCT No. 2
ANA:  42203
Collector since 1956
Brissyboy
Trade Count: (2)
Knight
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 43



View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: November 16, 2007, 09:12:37 PM »

So I still have the same question! Were these coins meant to be or was one or the other for a proof or mint set only? Or was this just a major mint boo-boo?
Hi Twoshadows, the incused flag variety die was suppose to be used for the Mint Set 50 cent coin but for some reason it was never used for that and the dies found their way into producing less than 200,000 circulation 50 cent coins. One might even consider them mules  Cheesy  because the incised die was suppose to be used for all circulation coins. And when you consider less than 200,000 coins out of 16,630,000 is a mighty small mintage. Mint/Baby Mint sets totalled 133,512 50 cent coins and to date only the incised flag has been found.

The coin in the Proof and Baby Proof sets used a different die again. As the coin has a coloured pad printed flag, the actual surface under the colour is totally smooth and flat - no incused or incised lines and no stars at all. It was all painted on to the flat flag surface.

Wayne
Logged

Wayne - Knight #69
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMF customization services by 2by2host.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!